<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>More Than Scratch The Surface &#187; Sponsored Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scratch99.com/tag/sponsored-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scratch99.com</link>
	<description>A Journey In Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finally &#8211; The Google Slap&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/.More Than Scratch The Surface has finally been penalised by Google. I noticed today that my toolbar PageRank has dropped from PR4 to PR0. It appears to only be a toolbar PR penalty &#8211; I am still in the same place in the SERPs. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/</a>.<br /><p><em>More Than Scratch The Surface</em> has finally been penalised by Google. I noticed today that my <strong>toolbar PageRank</strong> has dropped from PR4 to PR0. It appears to only be a <strong>toolbar PR penalty</strong> &#8211; I am still in the same place in the <strong>SERPs</strong>.</p>
<p>I say finally, because I&#8217;ve been watching other sites get penalised, while mine remained untouched. The cause of my penalty: two sponsored posts I wrote about three months ago. Until now, Google hadn&#8217;t noticed them.</p>
<h2>Goodbye PayPerPost</h2>
<p>Like RT, I&#8217;ve said <a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/01/29/goodbye-izea-and-payperpost-it-was-nice-knowing-you/" target="_blank"><strong>goodbye to PayPerPost</strong></a>. I only did two sponsored posts and it&#8217;s almost 3 months since the last one. I initially stopped doing them because I couldn&#8217;t find any fitting the subject of this blog. Then, as more and more blogs were <strong>penalised by Google</strong>, I decided to hold off doing any more.</p>
<p>I thought about adding <strong>nofollow</strong> to the links when Terence Chang recently <strong><a href="http://www.terencechang.com/2008/01/14/text-link-ads-may-kill-your-google-page-rank/" target="_blank">lost his toolbar PR</a></strong>. I&#8217;m not sure why I didn&#8217;t. If I&#8217;m honest, I guess I thought that if Google hadn&#8217;t already penalised me, then they must have missed me. So if you are thinking about fixing any issues on your site, do it today!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now added <strong>nofollow</strong> to the links and <strong>requested reconsideration </strong>via Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools. Now, I wait and hope my <strong>toolbar PR is restored</strong>. </p>
<h2>Why Am I Worried About Toolbar PR?</h2>
<p>Cynics will be asking why I&#8217;m so worried about <strong>toolbar PR</strong>, given my somewhat anti-Google stance on previous posts, such as <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/"><strong>Final Thoughts On The PageRank Debacle</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/" target="_blank"><strong>I Signed Up For PayPerPost</strong></a>.</p>
<p>There are several reasons for my change of stance:</p>
<ol>
<li>Originally, I was angry that so many fine bloggers were penalised for what was normal practice. It <strong>felt</strong> like Google was being very unfair. I&#8217;ll admit I didn&#8217;t know anything about Google&#8217;s Terms Of Service at the time. Since then, I&#8217;ve come to realise that Google had stated that the nofollow tag must be added to paid reviews and advertising. I still feel that <strong>Google should have communicated this better</strong> to the average blogger before penalising them, but in hindsight, they could have reduced real PR rather than just toolbar PR. A turning point in my attitude came when I read a well-considered <a href="http://makemoneyforbeginners.blogspot.com/2007/11/i-hate-defending-google-but.html" target="_blank"><strong>defence of Google</strong></a>.</li>
<li>I originally thought, like many others, that I didn&#8217;t need Google. I&#8217;ve since come to realise that although it may be possible to have a successful site without <strong>Google search traffic</strong>, this traffic is where most of the money is. Search engine visitors are the one who are most likely to click ads or buy something (whether from Adsense or Amazon). Turning your back on Google&#8217;s search traffic has to be considered as shooting yourself in the foot. <strong>If I value the search traffic, I have to play by Google&#8217;s rules</strong>. I&#8217;m now happy to do so: In fact only 3 days ago, <em>I turned down an approach to buy links</em> on my site.</li>
<li>I was making very little from <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/tag/adsense/" target="_blank"><strong>Adsense</strong></a> at the time and it appeared that sponsored posts were a better option. This may indeed be the case for some blogs, but I&#8217;ve come to understand Adsense much better since then. As I&#8217;ve learnt more about Adsense, it&#8217;s started performing better &#8211; and it&#8217;ll only get better as my site grows. Long term, Adsense is a better option.</li>
<li>Although <strong>toolbar PR</strong> is pretty much irrelevant (it&#8217;s your real PR and position in the SERPs that really matter), <em>most people don&#8217;t realise that</em>. Why is that important? Well, it&#8217;d important if I wanted to sell links or write sponsored posts, because they&#8217;re based on <strong>toolbar PR</strong>, but <em>I&#8217;m not going to do that</em>! However, I&#8217;ll be moving to Brisbane in about 3 months and I&#8217;ll be looking for a web-related job. You never know, a PR4 website <em>may</em> help me get such a job, a PR0 site probably won&#8217;t!</li>
</ol>
<h2>Final Thoughts</h2>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have to post this. Google don&#8217;t care whether I make this post or not. I could have just <strong>requested reconsideration</strong> quietly without mentioning it and most people wouldn&#8217;t have noticed. But that&#8217;s not my way. If I feel I&#8217;ve made a mistake, I&#8217;ll put my hand up and admit it.</p>
<p>In the past I&#8217;ve said things that were <strong>anti-Google</strong> and <strong>pro-sponsored posts</strong>. At the time I believed what I said and there is an element of truth in those statements. It may be that for some people, sponsored posts are the best way to monetize their sites. It&#8217;s quick and easy money for a small blog, while Adsense won&#8217;t start working well until you&#8217;ve built your blog up and you understand how it works a little better.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve come to realise that in the bigger picture, Google search traffic is a very important element of a successful site. It&#8217;s not something I want to lose, so I&#8217;ll play by Google&#8217;s rules. Today, I&#8217;ve only <strong>lost my</strong> <strong>toolbar PR</strong>, tomorrow it may be my <strong>real PageRank</strong> and my <strong>position in the SERPs</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Signed Up For PayPerPost</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/.When I started blogging five months ago, I hadn&#8217;t even considered the possibility of writing sponsored posts. To be honest, I only wanted to write original content and I was against memes, awards, sponsored posts, etc. EDIT: Since writing this post, I&#8217;ve changed my views [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/</a>.<br /><p>When I started blogging five months ago, I hadn&#8217;t even considered the possibility of writing sponsored posts. To be honest, I only wanted to write original content and I was against memes, awards, sponsored posts, etc.</p>
<div class="csstextbox1">EDIT: Since writing this post, I&#8217;ve changed my views somewhat. Please read my post on the <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/"><strong>toolbar PageRank penalty</strong></a> for more information.</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve just signed up with <strong>payperpost</strong>, so obviously my views have changed!</p>
<p>Why? Mainly because of the many blogs I frequent which include sponsored posts. In general these are well done and don&#8217;t detract from the site &#8211; in fact they often <strong>add value to the site</strong>. RT at Untwisted Vortex always makes sponsored posts entertaining and informative. They are worth reading even if you don&#8217;t need the sponsored service right now. I&#8217;m guessing people will remember his posts when they <strong>do</strong> need that service.</p>
<p>Now, why did I choose <strong>PayPerPost</strong>? Here are some of the reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>I&#8217;ve read many reviews of sponsored post services and <strong>PayPerPost</strong> <em>always</em> seem to come first. </li>
<li>Most of the blogger I know that write sponsored posts are using <strong>PayPerPost</strong>. </li>
<li>RT from Untwisted Vortex has been an inspiration to me in many ways and he recommends <strong>PayPerPost</strong>. </li>
</ol>
<p><strong>PayPerPost</strong> also have a reputation for having <strong>lots of opportunities</strong> and are known for <strong>being reliable</strong> (in terms of payment), two things which are important to bloggers. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, <strong>PayPerPost</strong> was really the only contender.</p>
<p>Will I make lots of money through <strong>PayPerPost</strong>? Who knows! Probably not enough to give up my day job, although it seems there are some bloggers who come close to that.</p>
<p>Personally, all I want is to cover my hosting costs and to occasionally take my family out to dinner. Google Adsense definitely isn&#8217;t going to allow that. <strong>PayPerPost</strong> will.</p>
<p><img src="http://tinyurl.com/2zdkue" /><br />
<a href="http://www.payperpost.com/?utm_source=opportunity&amp;utm_medium=disclosure%2Bbadge" rel="nofollow"></a> </p>
<script type="text/javascript">Nifty("div.csstextbox1","bgcolor-#FFFFFF");</script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/11/signed-up-for-payperpost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Thoughts On The PageRank Debacle</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/.Many things have been said about the recent toolbar PageRank update. Most tend to agree that PageRank has lost relevance and that we shouldn&#8217;t place too much importance on it. Most of us feel it&#8217;s time to move on and stop talking about it. I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</a>.<br /><p>Many things have been said about the recent <strong>toolbar PageRank update</strong>. Most tend to agree that PageRank has <strong>lost relevance</strong> and that we shouldn&#8217;t place too much importance on it. Most of us feel it&#8217;s time to move on and stop talking about it. I&#8217;ll do that, but not until I&#8217;ve had a final say on the matter. </p>
<div class="csstextbox1">EDIT: Since writing this post, I&#8217;ve changed my views somewhat. Please read my post on the <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/"><strong>toolbar PageRank penalty</strong></a> for more information.</div>
<h2>On A Positive Note</h2>
<p>Firstly, some sites, mine included, have received a good <strong>PageRank</strong>. I am very happy that my site is PR4. I&#8217;ve worked hard and waited a long time for the update. I was expecting PR1 or PR2 at best, so I am thrilled with <strong>PR4</strong>. </p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s a little hollow, because so many sites have ranked lower than they should (then again maybe mine is ranked too high).</p>
<h2>Sites That Should Be Higher</h2>
<p>I&#8217;m only naming a few sites that I read regularly. There are <em>many more</em> that deserve to be higher, that I&#8217;m not aware of right now. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start with <strong><a title="Blog Search Engine Performance, WordPress, Niche Marketing, Affiliate Marketing Tips and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude" href="http://andybeard.eu/" target="_blank">authority blogger Andy Beard</a></strong>, whose site should be PR 6 in my opinion. PR4 is just wrong. This is a <em>definitive case</em> showing that PageRank is <em>not an accurate reflection of a site&#8217;s worth</em>.</p>
<p>The following are other great sites that I read regularly, which are definitely worth more than the PR3 they&#8217;ve been given:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Lucia Liljegren comments on blogs about making money blogging" href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Big Bucks Blogger</strong></a> </li>
<li><a title="Blog Reviews, Promotion, Issues, Monetization and More" href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Untwisted Vortex</strong></a> </li>
<li><strong><a title="The Cayman Host Blog" href="http://www.thecaymanhost.com/blog/" target="_blank">The Cayman Host Blog</a></strong> </li>
<li><strong><a title="Making money through ethical marketing" href="http://ez-onlinemoney.com/blog/" target="_blank">The Make Money Blog</a></strong> </li>
</ul>
<p>All of these sites serve up quality content on a regular basis. They have a much larger body of work than my site and many more backlinks. I know my <a title="The home page of the DualFeeds plugin for WordPress" href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-dualfeeds/" target="_blank">DualFeeds plugin</a> boosted my PR a lot, but I just can&#8217;t understand how their PR is lower than mine. It&#8217;s incredulous!</p>
<h2>What Can I Do About It?</h2>
<p><strong>Stop using Google</strong>. I&#8217;ve read people suggest this. <strong>Would it work</strong>? Probably not. Even 10,000 bloggers abandoning Google probably wouldn&#8217;t have any effect. <strong>Am I willing to do it</strong>? Honestly, no. Some of their tools are very useful and I would find it hard to give them up. And as Josh points out <a title="Post arguing that boycotting Google because of the Pagerank saga is not sensible" href="http://ez-onlinemoney.com/blog/traffic-generation/google-brings-traffic-why-boycott-it/" target="_blank">Google Brings Traffic &#8211; Why Boycott it?</a> But full marks for Maurice who <a title="Post about giving up Google&#x27;s tools" href="http://www.thecaymanhost.com/blog/item/google-analytics-removed-small-moves" target="_blank">stopped using Google tools</a> even before the recent PageRank penalties.</p>
<p><strong>Promote other alternatives</strong>. Many of us are Google centric, but there are other options out there. We can easily promote these options, instead of, <em>or as well as</em>, Google. We should be doing this anyway!</p>
<p><strong>Pass on the link love</strong>. I&#8217;m going to try to link to the sites I listed above more often. Of course I&#8217;ll only link to them only when it&#8217;s relevant. As I already link to them fairly often, it probably won&#8217;t have much effect, but it&#8217;s the least I can do. I&#8217;ll <em>try</em> to give good quality links rather than making the common <a title="Post about linking mistakes frequently encountered on blogs and how to link correctly for maximum link juice" href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/linking-mistakes.html" target="_blank">linking mistakes encountered on blogs</a> outlined by Andy. </p>
<p><strong>Move on, remembering that PageRank isn&#8217;t really relevent</strong>. It&#8217;s time for us to do this. Things like traffic and subscriptions are more important. Hopefully advertisers will stop using PR to measure the worth of sites.</p>
<h2>So Is Google Evil?</h2>
<p>When the first round of penalties kicked off, RT asked <a title="Post discussing the first round of PageRank reductions" href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2007/10/10/is-google-evil-now/" target="_blank">Is Google Evil Now?</a> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they are. I think they just have a different agenda from us bloggers. It&#8217;s their search engine, it&#8217;s their PageRank system and they can do what they like with them. My real frustration with Google is that they aren&#8217;t open enough about what&#8217;s happening and aren&#8217;t specific enough about the rules. No one really is <em>really sure</em> what&#8217;s okay and what&#8217;s not. </p>
<p>Getting slapped for something you thought was okay is a lot worse than getting slapped for something you knew was naughty.</p>
<h2>PageRank Alternatives?</h2>
<p>If PageRank is not an accurate reflection any more, can someone else come up with an alternative ranking system, which is fair and updated regularly?</p>
<p>There have been other ranking systems but they weren&#8217;t adopted widely. To be successful, such a system would have to be introduced by a big name. </p>
<p>My original thought, first voiced in the comments of <a title="Another post about the recent PageRank update, by Chris at Blog-Op" href="http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/" target="_blank">Reflections On The Google Slapfest</a>, is that Yahoo would be the ideal candidate. They must have a private ranking system already and they&#8217;d love to deal a blow to Google.</p>
<p>However, I found Yahoo already tried this back in 2004 (or thereabouts). Yahoo called their system Webrank, but it seems to have been abandoned long ago. When I searched for information on it, what I mostly found was webmasters saying that it was just a poor copy of PageRank and it wasn&#8217;t worth worrying about. So, to an extant, we&#8217;ve made our own bed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that I also found complaints about Yahoo applying penalties. Sound familiar? </p>
<p>Maybe it just isn&#8217;t going to get any better. Or maybe we are underestimating how hard it is to make systems covering such a massive number of sites work successfully. Still I&#8217;d like to see Yahoo have a go.</p>
<h2>What I Won&#8217;t Be Doing</h2>
<p>I won&#8217;t be stopping writing sponsored posts. Adsense: 35 cents in a month; Sponsored Posts: $16 for one post (on a topic I&#8217;d write about anyway). If you can pass my Maths Comment Spam Protection, you can add this up!</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be <a title="Six Reasons I Won&#x2019;t Cloaks Nofollows so Only Google Sees Them." href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/six-reasons-i-wont-cloaks-nofollows-so-only-google-sees-them/" target="_blank">cloaking Nofollows so only Google sees them</a> &#8211; Thanks Lucia.</p>
<p>And I won&#8217;t be talking about this any more. Well maybe in the comments. <img src='http://www.scratch99.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>The Final Word</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve said my piece. Now I&#8217;m moving on&#8230;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">Nifty("div.csstextbox1","bgcolor-#FFFFFF");</script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk
Object Caching 551/569 objects using disk

Served from: www.scratch99.com @ 2010-09-10 19:54:23 -->