<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>More Than Scratch The Surface &#187; linking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scratch99.com/tag/linking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scratch99.com</link>
	<description>A Journey In Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How To Prevent Smart Pricing &#8211; Great Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make money online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/.Some of my most popular posts are those in my make money online series that discuss how to avoid Adsense smart pricing by displaying Adsense only to search engine visitors. Now I&#8217;ve found the most complete solution to the problem of smart pricing, over on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/">http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/</a>.<br /><p>Some of my most popular posts are those in my <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/tag/make-money-online/" target="_blank">make money online</a> series that discuss <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/avoid-adsense-smart-pricing-on-blogs/" target="_blank">how to avoid Adsense smart pricing</a> by displaying Adsense only to search engine visitors. Now I&#8217;ve found the <b>most complete solution to the problem of smart pricing</b>, over on the Blog associated with RT&#8217;s <a href="http://connectcontent.com/blog/" target="_blank">backlinks service</a>  (more below).</p>
<h2>What Is Smart Pricing?</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve explained this many times before, but here&#8217;s the short answer again:</p>
<p>Smart Pricing is a penalty that Google applies to Adsense accounts (yes the entire account) that don&#8217;t convert well for the advertiser. This can result in a <strong>penalty of up to 90%</strong> of what you earn for a click. Pretty significant hey! </p>
<p>To <strong>avoid smart pricing</strong>, you need to provide the advertisers with <strong>targeted traffic</strong>. This traffic will convert well for the advertiser and ensure that you don&#8217;t attract the smart pricing penalty. Search engine visitors provide targeted traffic (no problem). Regular readers and social networks visitors provide untargeted traffic (problem). <strong>Many bloggers are smart priced without even knowing it</strong>.</p>
<p>If you need any further information, see Grizzly&#8217;s authorative <a href="http://makemoneyforbeginners.blogspot.com/2008/04/optimization-tips-for-adsense.html" target="_blank">explanation of smart pricing</a>. This explains the intricacies of smart pricing far better than I can. If you&#8217;re trying to <a href="http://thekeywordacademy.com/" target="_blank">make money online</a>, then you need to understand this.</p>
<h2>How To Prevent Smart Pricing &#8211; My Solutions</h2>
<p>As I said, I&#8217;ve written quite a few posts about <strong>how to prevent smart pricing</strong>. These all centre around displaying Adsense to only search visitors (targeted), not to your regular visitors or social media visitors (both untargeted).</p>
<p>I started with a <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/shylock-adsense-plugin-hack-to-avoid-adsense-smart-pricing/">hack to the Shylock Adsense Plugin</a> (for WordPress) so that only search engine visitors would see ads (regular visitor wouldn&#8217;t see them). This could also be used for showing Adsense directly, without using Shylock.</p>
<p>This solution only displayed Adsense ad units on the first page that a visitor landed on. If they navigated to another page on your site, Adsense wouldn&#8217;t appear, as they no longer came immediately from a search engine. Therefore, I followed up with an improved solution that <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/09/avoid-smart-pricing-show-adsense-only-to-search-engine-visitors/">shows ads to search traffic</a> on subsequent pages as well (by setting a cookie).</p>
<p>Later, I converted this solution to work on the Blogger platform, so now you can <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2009/01/make-money-online-smart-pricing-on-blogger/">filter out non-search visitors on Blogger</a> as well.</p>
<h2>The Most Complete Solution To Smart Pricing</h2>
<p>RT&#8217;s post on <a href="http://connectcontent.com/blog/filtering-out-non-search-visitors-in-wordpress/" target="_blank">filtering out non search engine visitors</a> in WordPress is amazing. Not only does his solution filter out non-search traffic, it also filters out certain search terms that are <strong>unlikely to convert well</strong> and posts from categories and tags that are not likely to convert because they <strong>aren&#8217;t targeted for Adsense</strong>, </p>
<p>This is the most complete solution I&#8217;ve seen. If you follow RT&#8217;s advice, then you are <strong>very unlikely to get smart priced by Google</strong>.</p>
<p>The only caveats are: </p>
<ul>
<li>It only works for the first page, not subsequent pages. I know RT will say that the vast majority of clicks come from the first page and there&#8217;s no point showing ads on subsequent pages. </li>
<li>It won&#8217;t work with PHP caching solutions, such as WP Super Cache (neither does mine). RT is working on a solution to this, although as he points out, the whole point is to get search traffic rather than loads of social traffic, so this may not be needed anyway. </li>
</ul>
<p>Following this technique should ensure that you are earning the maximum amount possible via Adsense.</p>
<h2>What Is ConnectContent?</h2>
<p>Before wrapping up, I&#8217;ll take the chance to explain what ConnectContent is. Chances are, if you&#8217;re interested in <strong>avoiding smart pricing</strong>, then you&#8217;ll be interested in ConnectContent as it can help you <strong>earn more money online</strong>.</p>
<p>RT founded ConnectContent to help members <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/go/connectcontent">get relevant links</a>, with relevant anchor text. Getting such links is the most important thing to do if you want to <strong>improve your rankings</strong> in the search engines. If you want to <strong>dominate your niche</strong>, relevant links are essential.</p>
<p>More information from the ConnectContent site:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>ConnectContent is a managed network, designed to promote relevancy between websites. Search engine quality guidelines are followed and reciprocal linking is discouraged while one-way linking is encouraged.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The service is not free, but is very reasonably priced: USD$12.00 per month (or USD$120.00 for a year). There is no restriction on how many links you can get, except for any self imposed limits on how many links you can give. The more you give, the more you receive.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an affiliate program that pays 50 percent of subscription fees as residual referral commissions. That means if two people sign up through your affiliate link, you break even. That&#8217;s leaving aside the extra money you can earn through improved rankings! <a href="http://adsensemoneymoney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Easy AdSense money</a>.</p>
<h2>Final Thoughts</h2>
<p>If you really want to <a href="http://www.makemoneywithadsensesite.com" target="_blank">make money with Adsense</a>, then <strong>make sure you&#8217;re not smart priced</strong>. Many people are only earning a fraction of what they could be. There is no guaranteed way of <strong>avoiding smart pricing</strong>, but RT&#8217;s solution is as close to a guarantee as you&#8217;ll find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2009/03/how-to-prevent-smart-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New WordPress Plugin &#8211; KeywordLuv</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My WordPress Plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KeywordLuv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/.I&#8217;d like to announce the release of KeywordLuv, my new WordPress plugin, but RT from Untwisted Vortex beat me to it, announcing it several days ago. I need to be quicker with this sort of thing! I don&#8217;t mind, as KeywordLuv was partially inspired by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/</a>.<br /><p>I&#8217;d <em>like</em> to announce the release of <strong><a href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/" target="_blank">KeywordLuv</a></strong>, my new <strong>WordPress plugin</strong>, but RT from <a title="Blog Reviews, Promotion, Issues, Monetization and More" href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/" target="_blank" class="broken_link"><strong>Untwisted Vortex</strong></a> beat me to it, <a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/04/04/wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/" target="_blank" class="broken_link"><strong>announcing it</strong></a> several days ago. I need to be quicker with this sort of thing! I don&#8217;t mind, as KeywordLuv was partially inspired by RT&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/03/27/backlink-building-with-dofollow-blogs-and-the-commentluv-wordpress-plugin/" class="broken_link"><strong>building backlinks via DoFollow blogs</strong></a>.</p>
<p>KeywordLuv helps you <strong>reward your commentators</strong> by separating their name from their keywords in the link to their site. This gives them <strong>improved anchor text</strong>, which can <strong>help their site rank higher in the search engine results</strong>.</p>
<h2>Example Of KeywordLuv</h2>
<p>If a commentator enters: &quot;Stephen@Custom WordPress Plugins&quot; in the Name field, their comment will have:</p>
<p class="codebox" style="font-size: 1em">Stephen from <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/">Custom WordPress Plugins</a> Says:</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t enter the @ symbol, the anchor text will simply display as normal. For a live example, see the first comment below. Feel free to leave a comment to try it out!</p>
<h2>What Are The Benefits?</h2>
<p>Most commentators enter their name in the Name field. This helps them rank well for searches on their name, but little else!</p>
<p>Some commentators enter their chosen keywords instead of their name. This helps them rank well for searches on their keywords, but many blog owners will mark them as spam! Even if you don&#8217;t mark them as spam, you probably get a little tired of talking to Miami Hotels!</p>
<p><strong>KeywordLuv</strong> lets them enter their name, so you can feel as though you are talking with a real person, while at the same time <strong>helping their blog rank well for their chosen keywords</strong>. It&#8217;s the best of both worlds!</p>
<h2>The Fine Print</h2>
<p>There are a couple of things you need to be aware of:</p>
<ol>
<li>For your commentators to really benefit from this, you will need a separate <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/ultimate-list-of-dofollow-plugins-banish-nofollow-from-comments-and-trackbacks.html"><strong>Dofollow plugin</strong></a>, to remove the nofollow tag. </li>
<li><strong>KeywordLuv</strong> may not work with all themes. For more information and workarounds, see <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/keywordluv-theme-compatibility-issue/"><strong>KeywordLuv &#8211; Theme Compatibility Issue</strong></a>. </li>
</ol>
<h2>Where Do I Get KeywordLuv?</h2>
<p>The plugin is available for download via the <a title="The KeywordLuv plugin for WordPress allows users to seperate their name from their keywords, for better anchor text." href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/"><strong>KeywordLuv plugin home page</strong></a>. More information about how <strong>KeywordLuv </strong>works and how to use it is also available on the plugin home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/04/new-wordpress-plugin-keywordluv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New WordPress Plugin &#8211; LocalCurrency</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My WordPress Plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[localcurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/.I&#8217;ve been pretty quiet for the last couple of weeks, mainly due to offline endeavours. However, I did find time to finish off a new WordPress plugin called LocalCurrency, that allows you to show currency values to your readers in their local currency.
For example: If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/</a>.<br /><p>I&#8217;ve been pretty quiet for the last couple of weeks, mainly due to offline endeavours. However, I did find time to finish off a new <strong>WordPress plugin </strong>called <a title="The LocalCurrency plugin for WordPress detects the visitor&#39;s country (by IP address) and shows them currency values in their local currency (with exchange rates from Yahoo! Finance)" href="http://www.jobsinchina.com/resources/wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/" target="_blank"><strong>LocalCurrency</strong></a>, that allows you to show currency values to your readers <strong>in their local currency</strong>.</p>
<p>For example: If a post contains <em>10 yuan</em>, a user from Australia will see <em>10 yuan (AUD$1.53)</em>, while a US user will see <em>10 yuan (USD$1.39)</em>.</p>
<h2>How LocalCurrency Works</h2>
<p><strong>LocalCurrency</strong> determines the reader&#8217;s country (via IP address), gets the current exchange rate from <strong>Yahoo! Finance</strong>, then calculates the equivalent value in the readers currency for any values in the post. It then updates the post so the reader can see their currency, in brackets after the original value.</p>
<p>All of this is done using &#8216;AJAX&#8217; techniques so that page load times aren&#8217;t affected. Readers can change their currency via a selection box if they desire.</p>
<h2>Where Do I Get LocalCurrency?</h2>
<p>See the <a title="The LocalCurrency plugin for WordPress shows users currency values in their local currency" href="http://www.jobsinchina.com/resources/wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/" target="_blank"><strong>LocalCurrency plugin home page</strong></a> for more information about LocalCurrency, a live example, and to download the plugin.</p>
<h2>Why Is It On JobsInChina?</h2>
<p>There is one big difference about this plugin, compared to my other plugins. <strong>LocalCurrency</strong> is a <strong>JobsInChina</strong> production. That means I&#8217;m hosting&#160; it on the JobsInChina.com website. There are several reasons for this:</p>
<ol>
<li>It was written for use on the <strong>JobsInChina</strong> blog </li>
<li>It&#8217;s running on that blog, not this one </li>
<li>It is more likely to appeal to a higher percentage of visitors to that blog (as many will start their own blog when <strong><a title="Living and Working in China" href="http://www.jobsinchina.com/" target="_blank">living in China</a></strong>). </li>
<li>Honestly, the backlinks will help <strong>JobsInChina</strong>. I&#8217;ll write more on this in the coming weeks, but a plugin is great at generating backlinks.</li>
</ol>
<p>This was a hard decision. This is my <strong>WordPress plugin</strong> site, so it could be argued that all my plugins belong here. Point three swayed the argument. <strong>JobsInChina</strong> is supposed to provide resources to people wanting to live in China. That includes bloggers!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all about point four. In fact, I&#8217;m sure there are SEO experts out there who&#8217;d say that it&#8217;d be better to keep the two sites separate and tightly focused. Of course it is possible for a site to be an authority on more than one topic. This blog has some authority for China &#8211; it ranks at position 20 for <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/first-break-from-blogging-and-chinese-hospitality/" target="_blank"><strong>Chinese Hospitality</strong></a> (it used to be on page one, but it&#8217;s slipping).</p>
<p>Anyway, I may come to regret the decision, but it&#8217;s been made now. I&#8217;ll provide any feedback on the SEO impact if it becomes obvious.</p>
<h2>Final Thoughts</h2>
<p>This was one of the more complicated plugins I&#8217;ve written, as it involved JavaScript and &#8216;AJAX&#8217;, but it&#8217;s been very satisfying to complete. I&#8217;m not expecting it to be a mainstream plugin, but it is handy for people living abroad who often talk about what they&#8217;ve spent recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2008/02/new-wordpress-plugin-localcurrency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Thoughts On The PageRank Debacle</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/.Many things have been said about the recent toolbar PageRank update. Most tend to agree that PageRank has lost relevance and that we shouldn&#8217;t place too much importance on it. Most of us feel it&#8217;s time to move on and stop talking about it. I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/</a>.<br /><p>Many things have been said about the recent <strong>toolbar PageRank update</strong>. Most tend to agree that PageRank has <strong>lost relevance</strong> and that we shouldn&#8217;t place too much importance on it. Most of us feel it&#8217;s time to move on and stop talking about it. I&#8217;ll do that, but not until I&#8217;ve had a final say on the matter. </p>
<div class="csstextbox1">EDIT: Since writing this post, I&#8217;ve changed my views somewhat. Please read my post on the <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2008/01/toolbar-pagerank-penalty/"><strong>toolbar PageRank penalty</strong></a> for more information.</div>
<h2>On A Positive Note</h2>
<p>Firstly, some sites, mine included, have received a good <strong>PageRank</strong>. I am very happy that my site is PR4. I&#8217;ve worked hard and waited a long time for the update. I was expecting PR1 or PR2 at best, so I am thrilled with <strong>PR4</strong>. </p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s a little hollow, because so many sites have ranked lower than they should (then again maybe mine is ranked too high).</p>
<h2>Sites That Should Be Higher</h2>
<p>I&#8217;m only naming a few sites that I read regularly. There are <em>many more</em> that deserve to be higher, that I&#8217;m not aware of right now. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start with <strong><a title="Blog Search Engine Performance, Wordpress, Niche Marketing, Affiliate Marketing Tips and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude" href="http://andybeard.eu/" target="_blank">authority blogger Andy Beard</a></strong>, whose site should be PR 6 in my opinion. PR4 is just wrong. This is a <em>definitive case</em> showing that PageRank is <em>not an accurate reflection of a site&#8217;s worth</em>.</p>
<p>The following are other great sites that I read regularly, which are definitely worth more than the PR3 they&#8217;ve been given:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Lucia Liljegren comments on blogs about making money blogging" href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Big Bucks Blogger</strong></a> </li>
<li><a title="Blog Reviews, Promotion, Issues, Monetization and More" href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/" target="_blank" class="broken_link"><strong>Untwisted Vortex</strong></a> </li>
<li><strong><a title="The Cayman Host Blog" href="http://www.thecaymanhost.com/blog/" target="_blank">The Cayman Host Blog</a></strong> </li>
<li><strong><a title="Making money through ethical marketing" href="http://ez-onlinemoney.com/blog/" target="_blank">The Make Money Blog</a></strong> </li>
</ul>
<p>All of these sites serve up quality content on a regular basis. They have a much larger body of work than my site and many more backlinks. I know my <a title="The home page of the DualFeeds plugin for WordPress" href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-dualfeeds/" target="_blank">DualFeeds plugin</a> boosted my PR a lot, but I just can&#8217;t understand how their PR is lower than mine. It&#8217;s incredulous!</p>
<h2>What Can I Do About It?</h2>
<p><strong>Stop using Google</strong>. I&#8217;ve read people suggest this. <strong>Would it work</strong>? Probably not. Even 10,000 bloggers abandoning Google probably wouldn&#8217;t have any effect. <strong>Am I willing to do it</strong>? Honestly, no. Some of their tools are very useful and I would find it hard to give them up. And as Josh points out <a title="Post arguing that boycotting Google because of the Pagerank saga is not sensible" href="http://ez-onlinemoney.com/blog/traffic-generation/google-brings-traffic-why-boycott-it/" target="_blank">Google Brings Traffic &#8211; Why Boycott it?</a> But full marks for Maurice who <a title="Post about giving up Google&#x27;s tools" href="http://www.thecaymanhost.com/blog/item/google-analytics-removed-small-moves" target="_blank">stopped using Google tools</a> even before the recent PageRank penalties.</p>
<p><strong>Promote other alternatives</strong>. Many of us are Google centric, but there are other options out there. We can easily promote these options, instead of, <em>or as well as</em>, Google. We should be doing this anyway!</p>
<p><strong>Pass on the link love</strong>. I&#8217;m going to try to link to the sites I listed above more often. Of course I&#8217;ll only link to them only when it&#8217;s relevant. As I already link to them fairly often, it probably won&#8217;t have much effect, but it&#8217;s the least I can do. I&#8217;ll <em>try</em> to give good quality links rather than making the common <a title="Post about linking mistakes frequently encountered on blogs and how to link correctly for maximum link juice" href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/linking-mistakes.html" target="_blank">linking mistakes encountered on blogs</a> outlined by Andy. </p>
<p><strong>Move on, remembering that PageRank isn&#8217;t really relevent</strong>. It&#8217;s time for us to do this. Things like traffic and subscriptions are more important. Hopefully advertisers will stop using PR to measure the worth of sites.</p>
<h2>So Is Google Evil?</h2>
<p>When the first round of penalties kicked off, RT asked <a title="Post discussing the first round of PageRank reductions" href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2007/10/10/is-google-evil-now/" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Is Google Evil Now?</a> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they are. I think they just have a different agenda from us bloggers. It&#8217;s their search engine, it&#8217;s their PageRank system and they can do what they like with them. My real frustration with Google is that they aren&#8217;t open enough about what&#8217;s happening and aren&#8217;t specific enough about the rules. No one really is <em>really sure</em> what&#8217;s okay and what&#8217;s not. </p>
<p>Getting slapped for something you thought was okay is a lot worse than getting slapped for something you knew was naughty.</p>
<h2>PageRank Alternatives?</h2>
<p>If PageRank is not an accurate reflection any more, can someone else come up with an alternative ranking system, which is fair and updated regularly?</p>
<p>There have been other ranking systems but they weren&#8217;t adopted widely. To be successful, such a system would have to be introduced by a big name. </p>
<p>My original thought, first voiced in the comments of <a title="Another post about the recent PageRank update, by Chris at Blog-Op" href="http://blog-op.com/reflections-on-the-google-slapfest/" target="_blank">Reflections On The Google Slapfest</a>, is that Yahoo would be the ideal candidate. They must have a private ranking system already and they&#8217;d love to deal a blow to Google.</p>
<p>However, I found Yahoo already tried this back in 2004 (or thereabouts). Yahoo called their system Webrank, but it seems to have been abandoned long ago. When I searched for information on it, what I mostly found was webmasters saying that it was just a poor copy of PageRank and it wasn&#8217;t worth worrying about. So, to an extant, we&#8217;ve made our own bed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that I also found complaints about Yahoo applying penalties. Sound familiar? </p>
<p>Maybe it just isn&#8217;t going to get any better. Or maybe we are underestimating how hard it is to make systems covering such a massive number of sites work successfully. Still I&#8217;d like to see Yahoo have a go.</p>
<h2>What I Won&#8217;t Be Doing</h2>
<p>I won&#8217;t be stopping writing sponsored posts. Adsense: 35 cents in a month; Sponsored Posts: $16 for one post (on a topic I&#8217;d write about anyway). If you can pass my Maths Comment Spam Protection, you can add this up!</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be <a title="Six Reasons I Won&#x2019;t Cloaks Nofollows so Only Google Sees Them." href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/six-reasons-i-wont-cloaks-nofollows-so-only-google-sees-them/" target="_blank">cloaking Nofollows so only Google sees them</a> &#8211; Thanks Lucia.</p>
<p>And I won&#8217;t be talking about this any more. Well maybe in the comments. <img src='http://www.scratch99.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>The Final Word</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve said my piece. Now I&#8217;m moving on&#8230;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">Nifty("div.csstextbox1","bgcolor-#FFFFFF");</script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/10/final-thoughts-on-the-pagerank-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Do Follow List</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/.Nofollow has been disabled on my blog for more than a month now. I joined the Bumpzee No Nofollow community immediately, but I only recently learned of the Do Follow List. I signed up a few days ago, but I have mixed feelings about this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/</a>.<br /><p><strong>Nofollow</strong> has been disabled on my blog for more than a month now. I joined the <strong>Bumpzee</strong> No Nofollow community immediately, but I only recently learned of the <a href="http://nicusor.com/do-follow-list/" title="The Do Follow List kept by Nicusor"><strong>Do Follow List</strong></a>. I signed up a few days ago, but I have mixed feelings about this list.</p>
<p>While I want to support anything that promotes <strong>DoFollow</strong>, something put me off the Do Follow List. What put me off specifically? The comment <a href="http://nicusor.com/" title="Nicusor's site">Nicusor</a> left on my site saying a link back would get a do-follow link on the list.</p>
<p>My first reaction was &#8220;hang on isn&#8217;t this all about DoFollow &#8211; <em>shouldn&#8217;t the list be DoFollow by default</em>?&#8221; His comment on my site gets him a dofollow link to both his main site and to the list itself &#8211; but I have to write him up to get a dofollow link on the list?</p>
<p>After I settled down a bit, I realised that I overreacted. </p>
<p>The logic discussed in the comments of my last post about <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/" title="My post about whether it's okay for plugins to promote themselves">plugins promoting themselves</a> can be applied here. If Nicusor is asking for the link back to help promote the list, so as to <strong>help promote DoFollow</strong>, then that is acceptable, perhaps even admirable. </p>
<p>Having checked out his site, I&#8217;m pretty sure <em>he&#8217;s genuinely trying to promote DoFollow</em>. I should also point out that I did get a dofollow link on the page where you <a href="http://nicusor.com/internet/do-follow-list-subscription/" title="Go to this page to sign up to the Do Follow List">comment to be added</a> to the list.</p>
<p>So <em>I do recommend you join this list</em>, if you are not already on it. However, be ready for link back request and try not to react as I did.</p>
<p>Nicusor, if you&#8217;re reading this, maybe you should explain that you&#8217;re doing this to help promote DoFollow when you leave the comment. It was easy to misunderstand this as being a cynical attempt to get a link &#8211; In hindsight, I know that&#8217;s not what you meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/the-dofollow-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Okay For Plugins To Promote Themselves?</title>
		<link>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DualFeeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 Stephen Cronin. Visit the original article at http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/.The upcoming release of the DualFeeds plugin for WordPress includes an optional feature which promotes the plugin by displaying  &#8216;Powered By DualFeeds&#8217;. I want to know what you think about this &#8211; is it okay for plugins to promote themselves?
The feature in question is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright © 2010 <a href="http://www.scratch99.com">Stephen Cronin</a>. Visit the original article at <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/">http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/</a>.<br /><p>The <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/dualfeeds-plugin-coming-update-11-new-features/" title="Rundown on the new features in the coming release of DualFeeds"><strong>upcoming release</strong></a> of the <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-dualfeeds/" title="The home page for the DualFeeds plugin for WordPress"><strong>DualFeeds plugin</strong></a> for WordPress includes an optional feature which promotes the plugin by displaying  &#8216;Powered By DualFeeds&#8217;. I want to know what <strong>you</strong> think about this &#8211; <em>is it okay for plugins to promote themselves</em>?</p>
<p>The feature in question is the DualFeeds sidebar widget, which provides links for the reader to subscribe to the Full Post, Summary and Comments Feeds. You can see an example of it in my sidebar &#8211; the bright orange one! </p>
<p>The user <em>does not have to</em> use this feature. They can set the sidebar widget to use text links, or they can manually setup links to the feeds in their theme. </p>
<p>I stopped short of adding a link to the plugin home page (though I was tempted), because it was too close to the Comment Feed link. I didn&#8217;t want people accidently clicking the DualFeeds link by accident.</p>
<p>Some plugins, such as the excellent Lucia&#8217;s Linky Love do add a link (it can be turned off), but most plugins don&#8217;t promote themselves at all. </p>
<p>What do you think &#8211; is <a href="http://www.everyonesarticles.com/Category/Advertising/65">self promotion</a> by a plugin okay? Please let me know in the comments or via the following poll:</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p>I appreciate that the circumstances have a bearing on whether it is acceptable or not, so I&#8217;d be grateful for any specific feedback on the &#8220;Powered By DualFeeds&#8221; statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scratch99.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-for-plugins-to-promote-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
